Seven reported codes
Source lists checked October 24, 2026. The latest addition remains 1MILLIONVISITS, reported by publishers on October 11. Five older codes have success messages in CHALLS’s September 30 recording, reviewed October 1; PART1 and 1MILLIONVISITS do not have a confirmed result in our reviewed footage. Current validity is untested by this wiki.
| Code | Reported reward | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
1MILLIONVISITS | A 60-minute booster, 7,500 Scrap and 5 Gems. | Publisher reports dated October 11, rechecked October 24. No reviewed redemption result. |
SORRY | Tower skins: Dreadnought and Stormcaller. | September 30 recording: 1:00–1:05. Reviewed October 1, 2026. |
BIGCODE | A 60-minute booster, 2 Scrap and 2 Gems. | September 30 recording: 1:50–1:55. Reviewed October 1, 2026. |
GIBILOSTHISSCRAP | A 60-minute booster, 6,000 Scrap and 50 Gems. | September 30 recording: 2:20–2:25. Reviewed October 1, 2026. |
IMAGEISAWESOME | A 30-minute booster, 500 Scrap and 20 Gems. | September 30 recording: 3:00–3:05. Reviewed October 1, 2026. |
LAUNCH | A 60-minute booster. | September 30 recording: 3:15–3:20. Reviewed October 1, 2026. |
PART1 | A 120-minute booster; Scrap reports differ: 2,000 or 5,000. | Media reports only. No confirmed PART1 result in the reviewed recording. |
A previous success message can remain on screen
In the recording, entering a new code leaves the earlier reward message visible. Compare the response before and after selecting Redeem; the text already on screen may belong to the previous code.
1MILLIONVISITS: the new reported code and what to check
Pro Game Guides and UrGameTips list 1MILLIONVISITS in their October 11 updates. Both describe a one-hour booster, 7,500 Scrap and 5 Gems. This October 14 source check adds the string as a reported candidate; it is not a claim that the code was released today or tested on this wiki’s account.
Copy the exact text from the table, open Codes inside the correct Roblox experience and submit it once. Read the new response before judging the reward. The older CHALLS video below explains how a previous success message can remain visible, but it predates this report and cannot verify 1MILLIONVISITS.
If the game returns an unclear result, keep the exact response and date. A publisher calling a code “working” does not reveal whether your account has already claimed it. We have not established an official expiry date or an original developer announcement for this entry.
Explanation of the comparison to make around Redeem. This is an editorial diagram, not a game screenshot, a new redemption result or a proof that 1MILLIONVISITS works.
How to redeem Horde Defenders codes
CHALLS’s recording shows a Codes entry on the main menu, below Store and above Updates. Destructoid’s earlier capture shows More → Codes inside the game after the tutorial. Use the route that matches the interface you see; the alpha interface can change.
- 01
Open the correct experience
Use the official Horde Defenders link on this page. This wiki covers Horizon Studios’ Roblox place 93237333081860.
- 02
Find the Codes panel
Check the main menu for Codes, as shown in CHALLS’s recording. If you are already in a session, compare the upper-left More → Codes route documented by Destructoid.
- 03
Enter one code exactly
Copy only the uppercase code text from the first column, without a leading space, trailing space or the reward description.
- 04
Redeem and read the response
Select Redeem inside Roblox and compare the result with the message shown before submission. In CHALLS’s recording, the previous result remains while the next code is being entered; wait for a fresh response before moving on.
Code not working? Check the response before trying again
Compare the response before and after you submit. The retained-message behavior is visible in CHALLS’s recording; the other branches below are checks to make if your game shows that situation. A failed attempt alone does not establish that a code has expired.
| What you see | Useful next check |
|---|---|
| The Codes menu is missing | Confirm the experience, then check the main-menu Codes entry and the in-session More menu shown in the source material. A changed menu is not evidence that a code expired. |
| The previous success message is still visible | Entering the next code does not clear the earlier result in the recording. Submit one entry, then look for a changed response. Do not pair the newly typed code with a message that was already present. |
| The entry is rejected | Check the spelling and surrounding spaces once. If the same entry is still rejected, record the exact response and date; do not label it expired without evidence. |
| The response says it was already claimed | Check the account you are using and its earlier claim history. Repeating the same entry is not evidence of a new reward. |
| The response explicitly says it expired | Treat that result as an expiry report for the code and session you tested. Keep the exact text and date when reporting a correction. |
| Success is shown, but the expected reward is unclear | Compare the reported reward type with what changed in the game. A tower skin, a timed booster and a resource balance are different results; do not assume every code adds Scrap. |
Keep the evidence useful
For a correction, record the code, date, exact in-game response and the source you followed. Crop account names and private chat out of any capture. This website cannot inspect or change your Roblox rewards.
What the recording actually shows
CHALLS recording, published September 30, 2026 (UTC); reviewed October 1. Compare the result before and after each submission. These historical results do not confirm that a code works today.
The YouTube player connects to Google when loaded. Your analytics choice does not control YouTube.
On October 1, 2026, we reviewed the first 3:21 of a CHALLS video published September 30 (UTC). The table records five changes in the redemption panel, each paired with the code entered immediately beforehand. The timestamp links start before the result changes so you can compare the two states.
The important detail is that entering the next code leaves the previous success message on screen. At 1:55, the input already begins GIBILOST, but the reward message still belongs to BIGCODE. In the five observed transitions, the input clears and a new result appears. A single frame containing a code and a success message can therefore pair two different submissions.
When redeeming, note the existing message, submit one code, then look for a fresh result. If the message has not changed, typing another code does not confirm that either entry succeeded. Read the reward types as well: BIGCODE’s new result specifies 2 Scrap and 2 Gems, not 2,000 Scrap.
At 3:20–3:21, PART1 is in the input box while LAUNCH’s one-hour booster result remains below it. That is not a PART1 success. Its reported reward stays in the first table because the publications list it; the reviewed footage does not confirm it.
The active-booster panel describes 1.5× Scrap per battle. Later booster results extend the displayed time in this recorded session rather than raising the displayed multiplier. This is a UI observation: inventory changes, resource balances and actual battle payouts were not checked. Use these transitions to understand the panel, not as a promise of what a code will award today.
| Code | Recording interval | New result shown by the UI |
|---|---|---|
| SORRY | 1:00–1:05 | Dreadnought and Stormcaller tower skins. |
| BIGCODE | 1:50–1:55 | A 60-minute booster, 2 Scrap and 2 Gems. |
| GIBILOSTHISSCRAP | 2:20–2:25 | A 60-minute booster, 6,000 Scrap and 50 Gems. |
| IMAGEISAWESOME | 3:00–3:05 | A 30-minute booster, 500 Scrap and 20 Gems. |
| LAUNCH | 3:15–3:20 | A 60-minute booster. |
CHALLS video frame at 1:55. The input already begins GIBILOST, while the message still shows BIGCODE’s one-hour booster, 2 Scrap and 2 Gems. This frame from the creator’s recording illustrates a retained result; it is not a screenshot of this wiki playing the game.
October 24 source check
Destructoid and Try Hard Guides still list the same seven codes in the pages retrieved for this check. Both articles date their code update to October 11; no newly reported code was confirmed. Their PART1 Scrap amounts and IMAGEISAWESOME Gem amounts still disagree. Keep the dated video results separate from these publisher reports, and read the new response after each redemption attempt. Live redemption remains untested by this wiki.
Why do code lists disagree?
October 14 update: Pro Game Guides, Destructoid, Try Hard Guides and UrGameTips now report 1MILLIONVISITS in October 11 updates. The dated comparison below explains why the older entries still carry different evidence and reward notes. The added media reports do not change the five results observed in the September 30 recording.
On October 8, 2026, we compared Pro Game Guides, Destructoid, Pocket Tactics, Try Hard Guides and Roblox Den. At that check, those lists contained the same six older codes; no additional code was found in that comparison. A publisher’s new check date does not establish a new code release or current validity.
PART1 is reported as a two-hour booster with 2,000 Scrap by Pro Game Guides and Destructoid, or 5,000 Scrap by Pocket Tactics, Try Hard Guides and Roblox Den. The reviewed recording has no confirmed PART1 result, so the current amount remains unverified.
For IMAGEISAWESOME, Try Hard Guides reports 200 Gems; the other four lists report 20. The CHALLS result at 3:00–3:05 shows 20 Gems in that September 30 session. A different published amount does not establish a changed reward in the game.
Roblox Den lists Golden and Glacier skins for SORRY, while Pro Game Guides, Destructoid and Pocket Tactics list Dreadnought and Stormcaller. The September 30 CHALLS result at 1:00–1:05 shows Dreadnought and Stormcaller. The first table retains that recorded result; the newer Roblox Den check date does not prove the skins have changed.
The table below preserves our October 1 source snapshot. Pocket Tactics replaced its older empty list on October 3. The October 8 comparison updates the media reports; the video evidence remains our October 1 review of the September 30 recording. No new in-game redemption test was performed.
| Source | Source date | What we found on October 1 |
|---|---|---|
| Pro Game Guides | September 29, 2026 | The six older codes recorded in our October 1 check. |
| Destructoid | September 29, 2026 | The same six codes, plus the More → Codes menu capture. |
| Pocket Tactics | September 26, 2026 | An older no-active-codes statement. |
| CHALLS recording | September 30, 2026 (UTC) | Five new success messages in the reviewed first 3:21; no confirmed PART1 result. |
Before trusting another code list
Follow the creator link from the official Roblox experience for developer announcements. Check the exact game, announcement date and any stated conditions. A code for a similarly named tower-defense game is not evidence for this one.
Use the redemption panel inside Roblox. This wiki does not redeem codes, ask for your password or provide a reward generator.
Expired codes
We have no independently confirmed expired entries. None of the reported codes has been moved to an expired list without a dated result. The October 11 reports for 1MILLIONVISITS do not establish an expiry date. If a code fails, distinguish the actual error from an assumption about its expiry.
Useful next pages
Sources & limitations
Source dates are listed below. Developer descriptions can change during Alpha. These reference notes are not a report of an independent playtest.
- Horde Defenders — official Roblox experience Checked 2026-10-01. Live game record for place 93237333081860 / universe 10766114988: developer, manual aiming, elevation, named heroes, campaign scope and advertised modes. The earlier refund notice is now absent.
- Pro Game Guides — codes report Checked 2026-10-08. Reports the same six codes. Its September 29 page lists 20 Gems for IMAGEISAWESOME and 2,000 Scrap for PART1; these are attributed reports, not independent redemption tests.
- Pocket Tactics — codes report Checked 2026-10-08. Its October 3 update adds the same six codes, replacing the no-codes statement seen on October 1. Lists PART1 at 5,000 Scrap; this is reporting, not recorded redemption evidence.
- Destructoid — original Codes-menu report Checked 2026-10-08. Its October 5 page still lists the same six codes, including 2,000 Scrap for PART1, and the More → Codes route. Its screenshots stay at the publisher. Current redemption remains untested by this wiki.
- CHALLS — Horde Defenders video guide Checked 2026-10-01. Third-party recording. Reviewed the first 3:21 for the main-menu Codes entry and five visible redemption-result changes. PART1 is only seen entered in that reviewed excerpt. This is recorded UI evidence, not a redemption test by this wiki or a guarantee that a code works now.
- Try Hard Guides — code reward comparison Checked 2026-10-08. Its September 30 report lists the same six codes, but 200 Gems for IMAGEISAWESOME and 5,000 Scrap for PART1. Used to compare published amounts, not to verify redemption.
- Roblox Den — codes and reward reports Checked 2026-10-08. Lists the same six codes. Reports Golden and Glacier skins for SORRY and 5,000 Scrap for PART1, differing from other reports and the dated SORRY recording. Its source-check timestamp is not a code release date or a redemption test by this wiki.
- Pro Game Guides — October 11 code report Checked 2026-10-14. Reports 1MILLIONVISITS with a one-hour booster, 7,500 Scrap and 5 Gems. An attributed media report, not an independent redemption test or an original developer announcement.
- UrGameTips — October 11 code report Checked 2026-10-14. Reports adding 1MILLIONVISITS on October 11 with 5 Gems, 7,500 Scrap and a one-hour booster. This does not verify current account eligibility or expiry.
- Destructoid — October 11 code report Checked 2026-10-14. Lists 1MILLIONVISITS in an October 11 update. Used to document the media list change, not as an independent test of redemption.
- Try Hard Guides — October 11 code report Checked 2026-10-14. Lists 1MILLIONVISITS in an October 11 update. Existing disagreements about older rewards are not treated as evidence that the in-game rewards changed.
- CHALLS — YouTube availability check, October 14 Checked 2026-10-14. Public search and oEmbed returned the CHALLS guide title and a standard YouTube iframe on October 14. This availability check does not add a new scene review, establish current code validity or prove playback in every visitor browser.
- UrGameTips — October 15 check, October 11 code addition Checked 2026-10-15. The page states a check on October 15 and a latest code addition on October 11. It lists the same seven reported codes. This check does not establish present redemption success.
- Destructoid — code list retrieved October 24 Checked 2026-10-24. The retrieved article is dated October 11 and lists the same seven codes. It reports PART1 as 2,000 Scrap and IMAGEISAWESOME as 20 Gems. This is a publisher report, not a live redemption test.
- Try Hard Guides — code list retrieved October 24 Checked 2026-10-24. The retrieved article is dated October 11 and lists the same seven codes. It reports PART1 as 5,000 Scrap and IMAGEISAWESOME as 200 Gems. These differences do not establish a change to the game rewards.